In reaching that holding, the court also concluded that neither California Public Utilities Code section 79.1 precluded the City from denying Sprint’s permit applications based on aesthetic concerns.Ĭiting its decision in MetroPCS, Inc. (“Sprint”) applications to construct wireless facilities in the public rights-of-way based on aesthetic considerations. § 332(c)(7) of the Telecommunications Act did not prohibit the City of Palos Verdes Estates (“City”) from denying two Sprint PCS Assets, L.L.C. District Court for the Central District of California finding that 47 U.S.C. 14, 2009, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a judgment of the U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |